Skip to main content

Interpreting Results

Hardware version

CANBench Duo v1.2 — Schematic-stage refresh of the V1.1 fabricated prototype. V1.2 is electrically identical to V1.1 and carries the InvenTree-canonical component metadata; no V1.2 boards exist yet — testing and bring-up reference the V1.1 hardware.

Other versions: v1.1 — fabricated prototype (current)

Once you have a clean measurement set per the Measurement Procedure, the next step is reading the trace. The CANBench Duo's LISN topology lets you make a small number of useful distinctions about what the DUT is emitting.

Baseline vs DUT

The environmental baseline (LISN powered, DUT disconnected — step 2 of the measurement procedure) is your reference for the session. Anything that appears in both the baseline and the DUT trace is coming from the bench supply, the ambient RF environment, or the analyser itself — not from the DUT.

The DUT-specific signature is the difference. Peaks present in the DUT trace but absent in the baseline are the DUT's conducted emissions. Magnitude shifts (e.g. a baseline peak that grows by 20 dB when the DUT is on) usually indicate the DUT is exciting an environmental resonance, not generating a new one.

LISN+ / LISN− symmetry comparison

The CANBench Duo's two LISN measurement ports tap the upper rail (LISN+, J2) and the lower rail (LISN−, J4) of the supply. With a fully symmetric DUT, the two ports should show identical signatures in both magnitude and shape.

Compare the two:

ObservationInterpretation
Similar signatures on both railsLikely common-mode (CM) dominant — the DUT is coupling disturbance to both rails together (typically via parasitic capacitance to chassis or local ground).
Asymmetric signatures (different on each rail)Differential-mode (DM) content present — the DUT is generating distinct switching activity that returns through the LISN ladder rather than via chassis coupling.
One rail much hotter than the otherDUT power topology is asymmetric (e.g. a buck converter whose switching node is on one rail only), OR a wiring fault is concentrating return current on one side.

The simplest way to do this comparison is to sweep LISN+ with LISN− terminated in 50 Ω, save the trace, then swap (sweep LISN− with LISN+ terminated) and overlay.

CM / DM separation via CANBench TrueZ

For more precise CM/DM resolution, pair the CANBench Duo with a CANBench TrueZ (the companion product). The TrueZ accepts both LISN rails as inputs and resolves them into separate CM and DM outputs:

LISN+ → TrueZ +
LISN− → TrueZ −
analyser → TrueZ CM (or TrueZ DM)
50 Ω terminator → the unused TrueZ output

This gives a clean, single-trace measurement of CM-only and DM-only content respectively, which is much easier to compare against limit lines than the rail-by-rail measurement.

CAN common-mode interpretation

The CAN-CM port (J6, when used per the Measurement Procedure §4) gives you the CAN bus's common-mode voltage at the SMA output via a 1 kΩ matched-pair summing tap. Read this trace as the CAN-bus-specific CM disturbance, distinct from supply-rail CM. The two are typically driven by different mechanisms in the DUT — supply CM comes from switching converters, CAN CM comes from the transceiver's transmit slew + bus impedance imbalance.

What "pre-compliance" means

The CANBench Duo is a pre-compliance instrument. It will tell you:

  • Whether your DUT has obvious conducted-emissions problems before you book a compliance test lab.
  • Where in the band the worst offenders live, so you can target filter changes.
  • How architectural changes (different filter topology, different switching frequency, etc.) compare against each other in relative terms.

It will NOT tell you:

  • Whether your DUT passes CISPR 25 at a specific class limit — that requires a calibrated chain, a Quasi-Peak detector at the prescribed RBWs, and (typically) an accredited lab.
  • Whether your DUT meets a radiated-emissions limit — this is conducted only.
  • Absolute amplitude accuracy beyond the typical ±1–2 dB of the analyser plus the CANBench Duo's measurement-port attenuation tolerance.

Treat CANBench Duo measurements as engineering data, not as a compliance verdict.

References